<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>barber martin agency &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barbermartin.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.barbermartin.com</link>
	<description>Barber Martin is a retail advertising and marketing agency based in Richmond, VA. We will r0xx0r your bottom line&#039;s s0xx0rs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:28:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>the goog spanks viacom, viacom reacts like spoiled brat</title>
		<link>http://www.barbermartin.com/2010/06/the-goog-spanks-viacom-viacom-reacts-like-spoiled-brat/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=the-goog-spanks-viacom-viacom-reacts-like-spoiled-brat</link>
		<comments>http://www.barbermartin.com/2010/06/the-goog-spanks-viacom-viacom-reacts-like-spoiled-brat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 18:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>j.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web 2.OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hooray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viacom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbermartin.com/?p=793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Hey hey hey&#8211;remember when Viacom was all &#8220;wah wah wah copyrighted content wah wah wah google is the suxx0rz&#8221; and the Goog was all &#8220;we r0xx0rz and own teh internetz&#8221; and then everyone decided that the best thing to do was to get very expensive lawyers involved in the process? Well surprise, folks: Google wins, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.barbermartin.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/angry_baby_head1.jpg" rel="shadowbox[post-793];player=img;"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-801" title="angry_baby_head" src="http://www.barbermartin.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/angry_baby_head1-278x300.jpg" alt="" width="195" height="210" /></a></p>
<p>Hey hey hey&#8211;remember when Viacom was all &#8220;wah wah wah copyrighted content wah wah wah google is the suxx0rz&#8221; and the Goog was all &#8220;we r0xx0rz and own teh internetz&#8221; and then everyone decided that the best thing to do was to get very expensive lawyers involved in the process? Well surprise, folks: Google wins, Viacom loses, and everyone&#8217;s favorite site is allowed to continue its operations without fear nor hindrance. <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/06/youtube-wins-case-against-viacom.html">Yesterday, a federal judge in New York sided with The Big G in a $1 billion copyright lawsuit filed by Viacom</a>, stating that the service was following the DMCA to the letter and that Viacom should find better things to do, like helping orphans and rescuing stray kittens. Thus, the geniuses at Viacom decided that the smartest reaction was to throw even more money at more lawyers to appeal the decision, based on the grounds that they really, really like spending money on lawyers.<span id="more-793"></span></p>
<p>Okay, so it&#8217;s a little more complicated than that. There was that <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20091006/report-leaked-e-mails-zing-youtube-in-viacom-copyright-suit/">big brouhaha over internal youtube emails</a> awhile back, and the <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=phony+viacom&amp;aq=f&amp;aqi=&amp;aql=&amp;oq=&amp;gs_rfai=">clusterfrak involving phony accounts created by Viacom in order to secretly promote its own wares</a>. But you know what? None of that matters. The feds have more or less OFFICIALLY approved the way the Internet works today, which means that we can all waste even more of our lives watching cats and babies do stupid, stupid things. Strike one for FREEDOM!</p>
<p>You know, if Viacom was smart, they&#8217;d just sweep this to the side, call it ancient history, and legally jump on the youtube bandwagon. Or maybe save the cash in order to produce better content. Appealing the decision is a waste of time and money&#8211;you can&#8217;t fight the Internet, after all. Drawing out this legal battle is just hurting their own marketing opportunities, and making them look like a bunch of selfish prats in the process.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what we want to know from you fine folks out there: where do you fall on this? Do you think Viacom actually has a case? If so, why? Because we honestly don&#8217;t know how Viacom can leave this little tussle smelling like roses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.barbermartin.com/2010/06/the-goog-spanks-viacom-viacom-reacts-like-spoiled-brat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>google to place ads in free mobile apps, plans to serve ads in your dreams to soon follow UPDATED</title>
		<link>http://www.barbermartin.com/2009/11/google-to-place-ads-in-free-mobile-apps/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=google-to-place-ads-in-free-mobile-apps</link>
		<comments>http://www.barbermartin.com/2009/11/google-to-place-ads-in-free-mobile-apps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>j.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[the low blow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acquisitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barbermartin.com/?p=467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chrome. Android. Google Voice. Gizmo5. AdMob. Yessiree folks, it seems like Google's getting ready to make a huge and aggressive move into the mobile market. Also: Apple and Google at war? Was the Gizmo5 acquisition partly made to spite Jobs and his boys?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Big G <a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-google10-2009nov10,0,63129.story">is going to buy AdMob</a>, a company that allows &#8216;em to plop ads onto your cellphones, for a mind-boggling $750 million.  We can all now look forward to having <a href="http://badcontextualads.tumblr.com/">hilariously inappropriate contextual ads</a> delivered to us day and night, no matter where we are!</p>
<p><strong>[CUE DRAMATIC MUSICAL STING]</strong></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="500" height="400" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/a1Y73sPHKxw" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="500" height="400" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/a1Y73sPHKxw"></embed></object></p>
<p>We truly do live <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bmk9CjEha8A" rel="shadowbox[post-467];player=swf;width=640;height=385;">IN THE FUTURE</a>!</p>
<p><span id="more-467"></span></p>
<p>In all seriousness, the boys down at Mountain View made a pretty sharp move. The future of mobile computing favors the rise of the smart phone, and Google just bought the biggest player in the nascent mobile advertising sandbox.</p>
<p>In other news, the Goog is also <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/09/exclusive-google-has-acquired-gizmo5/">planning on acquiring Gizmo5</a>, a VOIP company.  If we take their Google Voice service, their ambitious Android OS platform, and the Chrome browser into consideration as well, we can only surmise that Brin and the boys are planning something big. Huge, even. Keep an eye out, folks. The mobile space is about to get infinitely more interesting in the coming months and years.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE: </strong>And this little story grows ever more interesting, as <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/henry-blodget-was-apple-seriously-bidding-for-admob-why-2009-11">Silicon Alley Insider&#8217;s Harry Blodget states that Apple was seriously bidding on AdMob as well</a>. In fact, SIA&#8217;s source hints that AdMob&#8217;s nearly absurd price was reached in order to outbid Jobs and company. Were the sunny lads from Cupertino strapping on their howitzers and preparing for war? Curiouser and curiouser&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.barbermartin.com/2009/11/google-to-place-ads-in-free-mobile-apps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

